发烧论坛

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

[分享]日本HI-END厂家核心人员透露其部分校声工作的详细过程 [复制链接]

查看: 2531|回复: 4
1#
[分享]日本HI-END厂家核心人员透露其部分校声工作的详细过程


在英文DIYAUDIO论坛的有一个有趣的话题《电解电容剥掉塑料皮后是否靓声》。
话题链接为http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6031&perpage=15&highlight=chassis+material&pagenumber=1

讨论中有一名来自日本HI-END厂家的网友jcarr  ,比较详细地披露了他们厂里对试验电解容电容的调声过程


jcarr  是日本HI-END厂家lyra的核心设计人员,在DIYAUDIO论坛上很有地位,每次发言都有相当高的水平。该厂网页上介绍其制造的前置放大器Connoisseur 4.0 Line Amplifier获得了日本发烧杂志《立体声》的2001年度产品大奖(Components of the Year COTY)


其厂家网址为http://www.lyraconnoisseur.com/  





以下是原文的转贴(位于话题中的第10页)。本人吸取以前的教训,不译了,自己看吧

Perhaps 10 years ago, I visted two electronic component manufacturers in quick succession. One made electret elements, and the other made electrolytic capacitors. Based on what I saw and was told on these separate field trips, I decided that it would be worth experimenting in modifying elecrolytic capacitors by changing the amount of compression and damping encountered by the metal can, and listening to the results using the methods that I described previously.

I recall that in this particular case I made up about 10 visually identical units, treated the electrolytic capacitors differently in each one, sealed them up, mixed them around, and labelled them randomly. I left them powered up for about 10 days, and listened while making notes.

Once I had finished noting my subjective impressions, I boxed up all of the units (without my listening notes), and sent them on to another person in charge of listening in our organization (at that time, I think there were 4 or 5 of us who formed a "listening panel". He also listened while writing down his subjective impressions, and once he had finished, sent the units on to the next person, and so on.

When the last person had finished, the units were sent back to our main workroom, we each brought in our listening notes, compared our notes to see what each of us thought of the sound of unit J, 7, *, etc. We then opened up the sealed units to see what was inside them, and figure out what modification was contributing to what sort of sonic change.

On the whole, we picked the completely peeled capacitors as offering the greatest, least ambiguous subjective sonic improvement for the least effort. We also concluded that it was better not to use the commonly supplied metal bands to secure the capacitors (changes in this area yielded measurable differences in distortion levels). Some other techniques were rejected because they resulted in divided opinions among our listening staff, were inaudible, or made the sound worse, while other techniques were deemed sonically worthwhile but likely to be too much of a PITA during production.

Even today, in my current products, some of the electrolytic capacitors have peeled sheaths.
分享 转发
TOP
2#

看来不是我能分享的。
TOP
3#

本人吸取以前的教训,不译了,自己看吧:


什么教训?被人转载?据为己有??
TOP
4#

研究了一下,发现这些字母我都认识!俺的键盘上都有!可他们连起来是啥意思呢?.................
TOP
5#

Perhaps 10 years ago, I visted two electronic component manufacturers in quick succession. One made electret elements, and the other made electrolytic capacitors. Based on what I saw and was told on these separate field trips, I decided that it would be worth experimenting in modifying elecrolytic capacitors by changing the amount of compression and damping encountered by the metal can, and listening to the results using the methods that I described previously.

I recall that in this particular case I made up about 10 visually identical units, treated the electrolytic capacitors differently in each one, sealed them up, mixed them around, and labelled them randomly. I left them powered up for about 10 days, and listened while making notes.

Once I had finished noting my subjective impressions, I boxed up all of the units (without my listening notes), and sent them on to another person in charge of listening in our organization (at that time, I think there were 4 or 5 of us who formed a "listening panel". He also listened while writing down his subjective impressions, and once he had finished, sent the units on to the next person, and so on.

When the last person had finished, the units were sent back to our main workroom, we each brought in our listening notes, compared our notes to see what each of us thought of the sound of unit J, 7, *, etc. We then opened up the sealed units to see what was inside them, and figure out what modification was contributing to what sort of sonic change.

On the whole, we picked the completely peeled capacitors as offering the greatest, least ambiguous subjective sonic improvement for the least effort. We also concluded that it was better not to use the commonly supplied metal bands to secure the capacitors (changes in this area yielded measurable differences in distortion levels). Some other techniques were rejected because they resulted in divided opinions among our listening staff, were inaudible, or made the sound worse, while other techniques were deemed sonically worthwhile but likely to be too much of a PITA during production.

Even today, in my current products, some of the electrolytic capacitors have peeled sheaths.
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题