发烧论坛

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

法国音乐甲虫老板P.L.的回信. [复制链接]

查看: 8642|回复: 26
1#
由于使用Audiomeca唱盘的原因,我一直和甲虫老板P.L.有email来往。P.L.过去是高文的设计师,自立门户成立Audiomeca。

应leslie 版主之邀,我去信讲了中国论坛上关于甲虫CD的争论,他给我的回信如下:

Hello,

.......(此处是关于我与他之间的其他信息,与甲虫CD无关,删去……)

Regarding the other point the reality is more complex. We work with CEC for more than 10 years and we sometimes used PCB's from them which we modified. That truth has never been a secret but other truthes can be pointed out: The situation is that for small companies like us it is somewhat a waste of time and also ridiculous in that ever changing market to develop for example a servo when you know that performances depends on the chip set. All is inside those chips where software and thousands of components are at work. You can easily understand that a handful of peripherical additional components cannot do any magic. So one can say that all servos, based on the same chip set, are almost the same. So, if you find a well made servo somewhere, if you like it, if you can have it and if you add a few modifications from your own, simply use it. Naturally, with other sections and when musical qualities are concerned the real job of a true audio designer starts. Sorry for being a bit tough but I'd like to say that the definition of any product is up to the designer only. If you do not like a product, don't buy. Even a well informed customer has no idea of the complex reality of the production chain from design to distribution and by the way just talking makes no sense. In the same time, please note that nobody complains when all players use the same CD mechanism ! For example, how many brands with the Philips CDM12 ? Audiomeca has designed and produced its own mechanisms from scratch. A long six years study before commercial launch. You know, all those kinds of story are internal to a company. Instead it is much more interesting to spend time listening to good music. I never go to any forum but I always reply to audiophile letters. Right now I am doing so for you. Thank you very much to you for speaking for me at your forum. This is very kind of you but please understand that if I have been happy to write and answer to your question, I am not at all interested to see my infos on any forum. To give more and more to be discussed at length is a waste of time and brings most of the time nothing good nore clear. Thanks for your understanding.
Hope everything alright for you. With all the best,

P.L.
分享 转发
TOP
2#

L版让我去信,主要是了解甲虫CD是否改自CEC,我没有提及其他东西。从回信看来,他是承认的。
TOP
3#

关于另一点(译者:就是甲虫CEC事件)说来话长。

我们和CEC合作超过10年,有时我们会用我们修改过的他们的PCB电路板。

事实上,这早就不是什么秘密,但我想指出一点:像我们这样一家小公司,转向去开发一个类似伺服系统这样的东西,是浪费时间,甚至是荒谬的,而它的性能完全由芯片决定,而芯片里面是软件和几千个零件在一起工作,所以你很容易了解,在芯片外面加几个零件不可能有什么神奇的效用。

可以说,所有的伺服系统,如果使用同样的芯片,几乎都是一样的东西。如果你找到一个你喜欢的制作精良的伺服系统,你又可以用它进行您想要的小改进,你只要用它就好了。

从另一个层面而言,器材的音乐性才是一个真正的音响设计师要做的工作。

抱歉我说的有点直接,但我还是想说,产品的解释权在设计师手上,如果你不喜欢一个产品,别买它就是了。一个再怎么见多识广的顾客,也无法了解从设计到销售这整个产品链的复杂性,就算用嘴巴告诉你也不会有什么概念(指光说不真正经历过的话)。

同时,请注意从来没有人抱怨过所有的播放机都使用同样的CD机构。举例:多少牌子在用飞利浦的CDM12?甲虫曾经设计并生产自己的CD机构,为此花了6年的研究。你知道,这样的一些故事是企业内部的事,与其谈论这些还不如多花点时间聆听音乐。

我从未到过任何论坛,但我一向回复发烧友的来信,就像我现在正在为您做的。非常感谢您在论坛里为我说话,这是您的好意,但请了解:既然我非常乐意直接写信回答您的问题,我就对我有些什么信息在论坛里被谈论毫无兴趣。去提供更多讨论的东西只是浪费时间,而且也永远说不清。谢谢您的理解……
TOP
4#

他的英文也不太好,我的翻译能力也有限,抱歉,大家将就看吧。
TOP
5#

1. 我和P.L.说不上熟,只是通email而已。
2. 另外P.L.英文本来就不大好,用的问候语不是很中国,而是很法国。
3. email抓图来展示个啥,要作假抓图也是假;
4. 我贴这封信出来是应版主之邀去信了解,无需证明什么说服力,要抬杠别找我;
5. 本人是此论坛菜鸟,与利益各方完全不认识,仅提供资料而已,不介入口水仗中。
TOP
6#

蒙版主信任,举手之劳而已。
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题