Rogers乐爵士音箱用家专栏 [复制链接]

请教各位大虾，LS7t（559(H) x 273(W) x 280(D)mm）用什么脚架好？木的？铁的？50CM?60CM？

rogers推荐使用刚性脚架，一般建议用顶板是“口”型的脚架，也就是所谓无顶板脚架，如果是有顶板的也不要紧，用脚钉（象棋子状）把箱子垫起来，这是因为很多人都认为rogers的箱子要“呼吸”，即让箱子自由谐振。

试过，提升明显。

谢谢两位大侠的指导！
请问楼上的大侠用的是什么型号的ROGERS,脚架是怎样的？！

rogers studio7，脚架是铸铁，有顶。后经zyh指点，垫上橡胶皮（补鞋子的那种），音场开阔，顺滑，且弹性十足，低蘋下潜深了许多。

我是用Studio7的，建议所有R记的喇叭都用铁架，这样才会体现到R记的韵味！

[quote] 原帖由 [b]8823021[/b] 于 2009-6-2 22:05:00 发表
rogers studio7，脚架是铸铁，有顶。后经zyh指点，垫上橡胶皮（补鞋子的那种），音场开阔，顺滑，且弹性十足，低蘋下潜深了许多。
[/quote]
Studio7的可塑性非常高，低频的质数直逼落地箱效果，慢慢玩吧！

[quote] 原帖由 [b]lsh1982[/b] 于 2009-5-27 22:20:00 发表
studio7的一点资料

Rogers 好聽喇叭 studio 7 出售(二手/$25000/台北市)

The Studio 7:

This was a redesign of the Studio 1a by Andy Whittle in 1993. The enclosure and bass/mid driver were retained from the Studio 1a, but the metal-dome tweeter was replaced by a 25mm soft-dome unit from Scanspeak. The bass alignment was altered to produce a drier, less boomy sound in a typical domestic environment. According to a review in the June 1993 issue of Hi-Fi News, the Studio 7 was much smoother and better balanced compared to the already high standard set by the 1a. Price then was £880 per pair.

外觀良好 八隻角無一撞凹 聲音自然滑順 是studio 1a 的改良新產品 歡迎預約試聽 歐洲原價880英磅 臺灣訂價為56000元 studio 1a 的訂價只有36000元 喇叭與studio 1a 同樣大小。  [/quote]
Studio7确实是studio 1a 的改良版，但ST7和ST1A的风格区别比较大的。1A我听过，非常有味道，我个人感觉要比5/9l来的自然和亲切。而St7就相对现代，注重了速度和高频的延伸，感觉更加全面，但1a的韵味就很难在ST7身上体现，我现在一直在往这个方向调整，开始有点味道了！

[quote] 原帖由 [b]lsh1982[/b] 于 2009-5-27 22:20:00 发表
studio7的一点资料

Rogers 好聽喇叭 studio 7 出售(二手/$25000/台北市)

The Studio 7:

This was a redesign of the Studio 1a by Andy Whittle in 1993. The enclosure and bass/mid driver were retained from the Studio 1a, but the metal-dome tweeter was replaced by a 25mm soft-dome unit from Scanspeak. The bass alignment was altered to produce a drier, less boomy sound in a typical domestic environment. According to a review in the June 1993 issue of Hi-Fi News, the Studio 7 was much smoother and better balanced compared to the already high standard set by the 1a. Price then was £880 per pair.

外觀良好 八隻角無一撞凹 聲音自然滑順 是studio 1a 的改良新產品 歡迎預約試聽 歐洲原價880英磅 臺灣訂價為56000元 studio 1a 的訂價只有36000元 喇叭與studio 1a 同樣大小。  [/quote]
Studio7确实是studio 1a 的改良版，但ST7和ST1A的风格区别比较大的。1A我听过，非常有味道，我个人感觉要比5/9l来的自然和亲切。而St7就相对现代，注重了速度和高频的延伸，感觉更加全面，但1a的韵味就很难在ST7身上体现，我现在一直在往这个方向调整，开始有点味道了！
[b]Studio 1a's:[/b]
The Studio 1a's are a more recent development, and at a glance appear to have more in common with the [url=http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/ls7.htm][color=#800080]LS7[/color][/url] than the earlier Studio 1's. They are a two-way design, using a clear polypropylene cone woofer and a dome tweeter. [color=#0000ff]Click here to read the Studio 1a brochure[/color], kindly submitted by Cliff Law.
Thanks are due again to Andrey Tiurpenko for sending me these pictures:

[table=98%][tr][td][img=240,383]http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/studio1a_1.jpg[/img][/td][td][img=240,383]http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/studio1a_2.jpg[/img][/td][/tr][/table]As you can see, they support "buy-wiring", as the market demanded at the time. As you can see, the connectors are mounted directly onto the rear panel, rather than the thin plastic tray seen on the LS7 and others. The dimensions are the same as the Studio 1's.

[table=98%][tr][td][img=240,240]http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/studio1a_3.jpg[/img][/td][td][img=240,240]http://www.mhennessy3.f9.co.uk/rogers/studio1a_4.jpg[/img][/td][/tr][/table]From the picture at least, the woofer looks identical to the unit used in the LS7t - does anyone know different? The tweeter is a 34mm metal dome unit made by Celestion.
I haven't had the chance to hear them myself, but Andrey says that compared to the LS7t's, the "Studio [1a] has better sound in all respects", which I can easily believe as they cost nearly double when new.

各位大侠，以下是我网上找到的资料：
木架和铁架同一高度应该是木架中频和人声表现好一些,铁架只要设计得合理也相当不错特别是在背景宁静度和底频冲击力一般木架是无可相比的,我用的器材是单端6V6推加拿大 风韵 我自己用铁仿制德国Foundation架跟我以前用的黑武士相拼黑武士输得很惨,简直无可抬头,因为单端机本身人声和中频以是很好了,用铁架来祢补他的功率小底频不足可以说是很相衬的.
请问下ROGERS的脚架应该选木还是铁啊？！