发烧论坛

注册

 

返回列表 12345678» / 13
发新话题 回复该主题

换胆初感记 [复制链接]

21#

kick 在 2004-5-26 19:26:07 发表的内容
不会这么惨吧,FEVER兄才估价5w,我花了快10w了。
ericfdai 兄发扬精神,给了我4只AMPEREX6922,但不知道配对没有。


Kick兄:
我那四只是以前几十块一只淘来的63年荷兰产Amperex Bugle Boy 6DJ8,不是6922. 品相不太好,但参数不错,虽然不是什么顶级名胆,但乐感一流,比你用的EH的强不少.用上后保证火气会小很多.误差应该在10%以内.

先尝尝Amperex,Mullard的味道,确定好自己喜欢的音色及胆管最佳搭配后,再动手购买Amperex或Mullard顶级靓胆不迟啊.
TOP
22#

各位胆友:

新版本的换胆初感记来了!

这次是10月26日的版本,包括325页内容比6月份的多81页
安装密码:如果使用过6月份版本的胆友,密码按照上次的规则可以推出。

在这里:
http://ericfdai.91x.net/
TOP
23#

检查一下管脚和管座金属片之间是否紧密接触,擦擦管脚,可能接触不良。

srongx 在 2004-6-8 10:54:05 发表的内容
srongx 在 2004-6-7 11:05:48 发表的内容
fever兄:这是我刚买到的7308,用了几天,昨天开机突然有扑扑两声,并且看到灯丝闪动,后来还是能正常工作,请问fever兄这是不是胆子快报废的前兆?[upload=jpg]uploadImages/2004671143258309.jpg[/upload]



fever兄请回答一下我这个问题好吗?
TOP
24#

找5751的朋友请看了:
SYLVANIA 黄字黑屏5751三云母55元一只
http://www.ediyshop.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=7&RootID=107883&ID=107883&skin=0
TOP
25#

Fever兄:
这四支RCA logo 的EL34,能否看出年代,产地(美国,日本或是欧洲)?
比JJ蓝屏,EH等如何。
是二手,同一机器拆下,你认为多少钱可入手。


[upload=gif]uploadImages/20046423383433437.gif[/upload]
TOP
26#

西门子cca是优质的E88CC,声音更醇和,应该好过同期的的砂金脚e88cc
最后编辑ericfdai
TOP
27#

fever 在 2004-6-20 22:26:22 发表的内容
ericfdai 在 2004-6-20 15:28:49 发表的内容
fever兄:
上次肥胆兄到我家听过用TFK的ecc83,在我的机器上,和黄字大盾搭配。味道和厚度确实胜过RCA black plate tirple mica 5751.
但5751高频很甜美,味道厚度和音场差了一些。
后来Sylvania yellow logoblack plate tirple mica 5751 .date code 5648D/312E(56年48周星期四,312E是Sylvania 的编号),和RCA比中频厚很多,高频不但甜美而且延伸好,音场也好一些,其他相当。
我还是认为,除了没有Mullard和TFK的特殊味道外,其他的应该不输。

Fever兄所提的更高型号Sylvania GB triple mica gray plate gold pins 5751,是否60年代产品(有些只有金标没有金脚的为政府或民用定制的印有JHS,CAA等标志的),我这支还没有extra suport rod(后期为了减少microphone 效应加的两根钢柱),是否应该更早期啊。


ericfdai  兄,美國 『金字』 『G B』 SYLVANIA  5751  必須是 『金腳』 才是上品,也是美國胆中的翹楚,音色和價格也比 『黃字』 『閃電嘜』 『黑屏』 『三雲母』 『方環』 的 5751  高,可否上張圖給各位 DX  看看。



请看,这只:好像没有金脚黑屏的。


[upload=jpg]uploadImages/200462110344856421.jpg[/upload]
最后编辑ericfdai
TOP
28#

Dr. PAN兄:

TFK Amperex Mullard 都是名震天下的名胆。就是因为这三种电子管都有自己的特殊韵味。Amperex 中高频柔和,娇嫩,自然,流畅,虽较为清淡直白点(比起TFK,Mullard),但音乐犹如缓缓的山泉刘流淌而出绕梁三日而不绝。

Mullard 则以浓郁而细腻的中频,这种独特味道,是任何胆不具备的,音乐的感情被表达的淋漓尽致,我相信任何人听起来都喜欢,因为你会忘了在听音响,而陶醉在音乐中

TFK 厚润的中频,凌厉的动态,超高的分析力,特别是中高频的味道(与Amperex 和Mullard不同),但也十分迷人,喜欢她的人,如痴如醉,为之所迷。


以我的经验,根据实际情况建议
就用Amperex 7308 美产大环 搭配 Mullard E88CC 金脚(200-300一只也好找),已经非常不错了,性价比也高。7308 PQ D环虽然更好,但由于极其稀有,太难找了,而且太贵了。

Amperex 7308 美产大环 我和 西门子E88CC,Mullard Ecc88,amperex bugle boy 等比过,远远胜过。动态好,音场好,高低频音染少,而且音乐味道极强,是一个很全面的胆。关键价格便宜好找,(这个管好找,最近广西的肥仔那里有一批,好像120一只(记住任何人卖超过150一只都贵了))。Mullard E88CC中频韵味极好,音乐味道无敌。二者搭配,取Amperex 7308凌厉的动态,宽深得音场,极好的高频和低频(中频有吹喇叭的独特味道),配合mullard 的无敌中频韵味。应该是绝佩。


另外一种TFK的E188cc(或CCA)和Mullard 搭配也是绝佩
Amperex 7308高频延伸较现行音染少,TFK中高频有一种特殊的味道。 TFK E188cc比 Amperex 7308起马贵三倍以上。建议你先听听TFK的味道再出手。

至于你喜欢那种味道您自己考虑吧。

补充:我讲的胆都是九成的二手胆价格,请多留意www.ediyshop.com/index1.asp和shop.valveart.net。
最后编辑ericfdai
TOP
29#

fever 在 2004-6-21 14:34:25 发表的内容
ericfdai 在 2004-6-21 10:38:21 发表的内容
fever 在 2004-6-20 22:26:22 发表的内容
[quote]ericfdai 在 2004-6-20 15:28:49 发表的内容
fever兄:
上次肥胆兄到我家听过用TFK的ecc83,在我的机器上,和黄字大盾搭配。味道和厚度确实胜过RCA black plate tirple mica 5751.
但5751高频很甜美,味道厚度和音场差了一些。
后来Sylvania yellow logoblack plate tirple mica 5751 .date code 5648D/312E(56年48周星期四,312E是Sylvania 的编号),和RCA比中频厚很多,高频不但甜美而且延伸好,音场也好一些,其他相当。
我还是认为,除了没有Mullard和TFK的特殊味道外,其他的应该不输。

Fever兄所提的更高型号Sylvania GB triple mica gray plate gold pins 5751,是否60年代产品(有些只有金标没有金脚的为政府或民用定制的印有JHS,CAA等标志的),我这支还没有extra suport rod(后期为了减少microphone 效应加的两根钢柱),是否应该更早期啊。


ericfdai  兄,美國 『金字』 『G B』 SYLVANIA  5751  必須是 『金腳』 才是上品,也是美國胆中的翹楚,音色和價格也比 『黃字』 『閃電嘜』 『黑屏』 『三雲母』 『方環』 的 5751  高,可否上張圖給各位 DX  看看。



请看,这只:好像没有金脚黑屏的。


[upload=jpg]uploadImages/200462110344856421.jpg[/upload]



ericfdai  兄,你說得對,SYLVANIA  的 『G B』 系列是只有 『灰屏』 而沒有 『黑屏』 的,圖中那枝連原装盒的 SYLVANIA  『G B』 看來成色甚新,是否 NOS ?是甚麽編號?可否來張近鏡?讓各位 DX  看清楚印字和內部結構。[/quote]


这图是网上找的,我没有这管子。
TOP
30#

玩5751,找5751的朋友必看。
相信会很有帮助的。
就是要动英文。

Life with 12AX7s - Part 1

Posted by Joe S on March 17, 1999 at 19:05:44:

Well, here's the promised second installment of my tube odyssey into the world of small signal NOS tubes. Just to get the formalities out of the way here first - Yes NOS tubes do sound different from current production tubes. Yes they will have real impact on the sound of your system. And yes, they all sound different. Which will sound best in your rig? Who knows. There are significant differences in the way in which individual components, systems and tastes interact with individual tubes so my experience may not predict yours, in other words - "Your mileage may vary" - but hopefully this may help separate some of the gems from the dregs for your own personal evaluation short list....

Well, first things first. This is the ubiquitous small signal triode, they are probably about as commonly used as 6DJ8/6922s and in my humble opinion they are widely misunderstood. Why? Because the hype surrounding a few specific supposedly invincible NOS brands is way out of proportion to their true quality and their likelihood to mesh with any given system - but more on that later. My opinions are based on using this type in my system in 4 different preamps over the years - most recently in the output stage of the Thor.

Now on to the tubes themselves. Brands and versions I have on hand include:


Sovtek 12AX7 WXTP(premium, supposedly modeled after the classic Telefunken)
Telefunken 12AX7 ribbed plates
Mullard 12AX7
Mullard CV 4004 box plate
Sylvania (Phillips) JAN 12AX7WA
Brimar CV 4004
RCA 12AX7A grey ribbed plate
Amperex 12AX7 Bugle Boy Holland
I've also owned and heard the GEs in the past but thankfully don't have a pair on hand at the moment ;-) Now, regarding nomenclature - the CV numbered tubes are British military tubes labeled according to the British Military numbering system - they are still just 12AX7s. The WA on the Phillips denotes a premium or select version.

Now when it comes to sound quality where do I begin? Well, to my ears - they ALL suck. There, I said it. Even (particularly?) the legendary Telefunkens. How can this be? Well, every 12AX7 I've ever heard has a common sonic character that's drives me to distraction. Specifically, they all sound a bit fuzzy, unfocused and hazy with a subtle sense of a soft sonic haze permeating a soundstage populated with large unfocused images. Added to this are other sonic artifacts unique to each tube. To hit a few of the highlights, here goes:

Telefunken 12AX7 ribbed plates - a typical soft, unfocused 12AX7 sound with big, soft, images allied with a bright bass shy character. I was shocked when I heard these guys first hand, but the more I talked to people who knew these tubes the better I understood them. I generally associate NOS tubes with a warmer, more harmonically complex & rich sound than current production, but light and airy is the order of the day here - to the pint of brightness. The secret is that these guys are a favorite for use in a lot of old classic gear from the '50s & '60s where the transformers, wire and caps used were thick, dull sounding sonic sludge. The bright balance of this tube is great complement for this kind of gear, but drop it into current broad bandwidth tube gear (like the Thor) and you might just get sonic hell - all for just $50 to $65 a tube!

Mullard 12AX7 ribbed plate - a warmer and fuller sound than the Tele, but it still suffers from the typical 12AX7 softness and lack of focus. A bit rolled at the extremes in my rig and more forgiving than the Tele. All in all a better choice for contemporary gear in most circumstances IMO than that tube - but I'm still not getting any shin burns from my sox rolling up and down in excitement at the prospect...

Mullard CV4004 box plate - very extended at the extremes, great frequency response overall in fact, but maybe even more fuzzy than the usual 12AX7.

Amperex 12AX7 - now this one is a bit more interesting. The typically vibrant yet rich and transparent Amperex sound with less of the typical 12AX7 softness and lack of focus. If I lived in a world in which I had to use a 12AX7 this would be the one I would use. But I don't & neither do you, but more on that later...

The rest of the pack - the Sylvania/ Phillips, GE, RCAs, etc.. are even worse. In fact, added to the usual (to my ears) 12AX7 sins add lack of refinement, microphonics and huge sample to sample variability. Not a pretty sight, trust me. And, oh yeah - the Sovtek? Its a cool harmonically bleached and basically disappointing beast that I wouldn't use under any circumstance - but hey, that's just my opinion.

Well I've just run roughshod over some of the most revered tubes in the NOS universe and basically damned them with faint praise at best. So what do you do if your gear has a couple of sockets that expect to see a 12AX7? Well I would propose that you cast an eye toward the 12AX7s more refined and altogether superior offspring - the cheap, lowly 5751. In its day (it was introduced in the mid '50s) the 5751 was created as premium 12AX7 designed by US manufacturers to overcome the well known limitations of American made 12AX7s, specifically: huge sample to sample variability, microphonics and noise. The fact is this tube had considerable care exercised in its design that is evidenced in its physical construction: Rigid metal rods linking the mica spacers for a more rigid less microphonic tube, a third mica spacer to brace the getter halo (again to combat microphonics), careful testing to assure consistency tube to tube and lower mu (apparently to combat noise) which results in an altogether more focused & palpable sound.

But then a funny thing happened. This tube was made in massive quantities by companies like Sylvania, RCA, GE and Raytheon and was supplied to the US military resulting in massive JAN stocks of NOS tubes lying about. Just not the sort of exclusive limited availability tube that exclusive NOS tube dealers could charge $ 50 a pop for - like those rare & exclusive Tele & Mullard 12AX7s...So a premium tube with great performance and a genuinely careful design has knocked about as a common $8 NOS plug in for 12AX7s while its less capable but better known 12AX7 competitors have achieved legend status. Now all may not be well in audio land here so I'll warn you now. The 5751 has a lower mu than a 12AX7 and some circuits purportedly don't abide by that but I've tried them in 4 preamps with no problems and this guy has found pride of place in a lot of tube preamps over the years CJ used them in their line stages for years and Joule Elektra ran them in the LA 100 / 200 series of preamps until very recently - so there are other people have heard the merit in these guys too.

So if the 5751 is the direction to look, where do you start? Well there are several choices and vintages (most of which are ridiculously cheap) that will put a Tele or Mullard 12AX7 to shame - but its late & that's a story for part 2 of the 12AX7 story....


Life with 12AX7s - Part 2

Posted by Joe S on March 22, 1999 at 08:42:13:

Well here's the other half of my personal journey into the world of 12AX7s. Again all the usual caveats apply, these observations are based on the sound of these tubes in my rig, in my room within the context of my taste. While I think these comments are somewhat generalizable the fact remains that given the variability of gear out there every tube has an ideal match out there somewhere so if I don't get excited about it that doesn't mean its a lousy tube - it just doesn't work as well in my rig as some of the others. Given that here we go.

Well, I tend to break the 5751 family of tubes into two groups in terms of sonic quality and capability. This is a bit arbitrary but it reflects my own preferences and experiences and the fact that I do find significant differences in sound quality among these beasts. The first group are the tubes that I find a bit less exceptional for various reasons - note that I'm not calling them bad tubes. In fact I find any of these superior to all 12AX7s (except perhaps for the Amperex) so they are in fact a great place to start your 5751 odyssey. There are other reasons you may want to start with these tubes as well, but more on that later. In this first group I would include the following:


GE grey plate
Sylvania grey plate
RCA black plate (common??? version)
RCA black plate (silver clip??? version)
Siemens grey plate
Now a few general comments regarding these guys before I get a bit more specific. All of these tubes have a more focused and transparent sound than 12AX7s with less fuzz & grain and a greater sense of palpability (sorry about that, but its the only word that fits for me, Jack G would say organic here, I think) which is particularly noticeable on vocals. When it comes to the way they present individual performers what you will hear from these guys a is a focused dimensional object rather than a flat cardboard cut out or fuzzy undefined image. This allied with the lack of the typical 12AX7 fuzz results in a more clear, open sound with good transparency and detail. I also hear a greater sense of layering in the soundstage with these guys than with 12AX7s. 5751s also tend to be warmer & smoother than some of the 12AX7s, in fact a few of these guys sound downright sweet in comparison. These traits are endemic to the type in my experience, but there are still significant differences tube to tube. Now, taken individually I hear something like this:

GE grey plate - 3 mica spacer version: A bit less refined than other 5751s, this is the entry level tube of this type. If you've ever heard the linestage of a CJ preamp made in the 1980s you've heard this tube since that's what CJ used in the line section of all their preamps for years. This tube can sound a little brash at times and is a bit less liquid than some of the others but its still a good tube. Common as water too, huge JAN stocks of this guy abound so he's cheap & readily available - typically $8 to $12 a tube. If you are messing with 5751s its worth grabbing a pair of these...

Sylvania grey plate - 3 mica spacer version: A bit more refined and grainless than the GE. Actually a pretty nice tube that was used in series the RCA black plate in the Joule Elektra LA 100 & 200 series preamps up through the mk 2 units. A little bit forward in balance in my experience as are all of the Sylvanias in this type (oh yeah, the best in this brand & family is yet to come! patience, patience...) Another JAN tube that's common & cheap. Once again if dabbling in 5751s, one I would put on my short list and definitely nab a pair of...

RCA black plate (common??? version) - 3 mica spacer version: OK controversy time. Common wisdom among 5751'o'philes is that this tube is the cats meow, the one to own, the audiophile's dream, the...uh, you get the point. But the odd thing is I have found multiple versions of this guy that vary rather dramatically in sound quality. I am using my own nomenclature here calling this the common version - I've seen this style more often than the others and is the type I've bought from 2 national tube dealers. The way to distinguish it from what's to follow is to look at the top and bottom corners of the black plates themselves where they protrude through the upper & lower mica spacers. If all you see are the corners of the plates themselves, or at most small silver rectangular tabs attached to the tips of the plates, its the type I'm referring to. Sound with this guy is quite good. He's smooth, warm, linear and sweet on top. If your system is bright and brash and needs a warming influence this guy could be the ticket, but still not in the league with the best of this type in my (not in the least bit humble) opinion. Another common tube, but it's audiophile reputation precedes it so it will typically set you back $12 to $18 or so - still cheap as dirt compared to those premium 12AX7s.

RCA black plate (silver clip??? version) - 3 mica spacer version: Talk about another kettle of fish. This tube is as different from the RCA above as any other tube of this type. Irony is I've NEVER seen any tube dealer distinguish between the two. To be fair, as near as I can tell, this guy is quite rare and I have only seen it (and bought it) at two hamfests. While the tube looks very similar to the description above it is distinguished by what I call silver clips. You will see these on the tips of the plates where they pass through the upper and lower mica spacers. That means there are 4 on top of the upper mica spacer and four below the bottom mica spacer, and you can't miss them - they are utterly unique in my experience and appear designed to clamp the entire plate / spacer assembly together (presumably to combat microphonics). These clips are chrome silver, about 1/5 of an inch long and wavy in shape - in short, they are big & obvious enough you can see them at a distance of 3 feet. Now, the sound. These guy is a very transparent and broad band tube, particularly extended on the high end with a very clear and open presentation. It also might just have the best soundstage of any 5751. The only downside? It can be a bit bright & relentless, I would only mate this with a dull, warm system that needs some spicing up. In my rig it sounds dazzling, but ultimately fatiguing. I don't know what to say about availability - the clip description is my own, I don't know of any NOS dealer who would know what you were talking about if you asked for it. Oh yeah I've found it in '50s RCA markings and in late 60's RCA new red logo livery, so I cant even comment on vintage. Oh yeah, when I have found it at hamfests, its relatively cheap - $6 to $12 a pop.

Siemens grey plate - 3 mica spacer version: Well I love Siemens 6922s, 7308s and even their 6DJ8s, but this is one tube I found a bit disappointing. Overall it is very linear, neutral almost to a fault and ultimately a bit sterile sounding. In my rig you could almost mistake this for a current manufacture tube. Somehow it just lacks a bit of that NOS magic that makes old tubes so fun - but then again if you have an overly romantic sounding system it might find a useful home in your rig. This tube tends to command premium prices ($20 and up) due to its lineage, but in my not so humble opinion it ain't worth it.

Now that's it for the more commonly available tubes in this family. I would however, like to address a few issues that arise relative to these guys as well as a few other brands that are actually nothing more than reliable of the above tubes before moving on to the esoterica.

First off - regarding 2 and 3 mica spacer tubes. The 5751 was somewhat unique in that its design originally added a third mica spacer (the round, usually serrated edge horizontal discs above and below the plates) above the upper mica spacer. In fact, every 1950's production tube of this type I've ever found has this upper disc which clamped the getter halo in place, apparently to combat microphonics. These early tubes invariable possess two metal strengthening rods between the plates which also helped lock the whole plate / spacer assembly together. But towards the end of the tube era that all changed. I've seen RCAs, Sylvanias and GEs from the mid to late '60s and '70s that have only two mica spacers and no strengthening rods - apparently casualties of cost cutting towards the end of the tube era. And it gets worse. I've measured quite a few 5751s for noise, gain & microphonics and I've always been struck buy how consistent, quiet and low in microphonics they are - the 3 mica spacer versions that is. The 2 spacer versions? Forget it. All over the map, noisy as hell, terrible for microphonics. Now I'm sure there are good 2 spacer tubes out there but the point is that while I would buy earlier 3 spacer tubes unmatched and untested, I wouldn't buy the 2 spacer versions that way - based on what I've measured & heard I just wouldn't trust them.

Now what about other brands? You will often see Motorola 5751s listed by some dealers. Should you buy them? Only if you need a pair of GEs and they cost no more than the GEs do, because that's what they are. Motorola never made them, they were OEM sourced tubes.

The same is true of another, more legendary brand - Amperex. Wow, could you imagine a 5751 made by this legendary company? It would have to be the best of all worlds and they are sold on ebay all the time... Well imagination is all you've got here, along with a common old GE that is. Unfortunately Amperex never made 5751s so we will never know what that tube would have sounded like - instead Amperex sourced them from GE and the sound is the same as a GE labeled tube - oh well, what might have been....Oh, and by the way, you will never see a Mullard, Brimar or Telefunken 5751 because they never made them. This tube was the domain of US manufacturers and the Siemens is the only non US brand I am aware of in this type.

Well, that's it for the more commonly available 5751s. Geez, this post is getting long & I haven't even touched on the second group of generally (but not always) rarer and even more desirable brands & types. I think that will have to be a story for part 3 of the 12AX7 odyssey which I will try to post before the day is out.


Life with 12AX7s
(5751s) - Part 3

Posted by Joe S on March 23, 1999 at 09:15:04:

OK, so lets put this puppy to bed. This installment of the 12AX7 odyssey deals with the 2nd group of 5751s I mentioned in part two. This group reflects my choice of the best of the best. As with most all good things in life prices go up with quality and that is reflected in these tubes as well -with a few happy exceptions. Actually these guys are still typically cheaper than the premium 12AX7s - the issue with them is more one of availability. I've actually found some of these guys (the Sylvania Gold Brands for instance) at some of the premium NOS tube dealers for half the price of a Tele or Mullard 'AX7, when they have them. Its just they usually don't have them. Given that lets have a look at the cream of the 5751 crop....

Well the tubes in my best of the best short list include the following:


GE black plate (definitely not to be confused with the grey plate version)
Tung Sol
Raytheon
Sylvania black plate government contract gold labels (JHS, CAA, etc..)
Sylvania Gold Brand black plate
Sylvania Gold Brand grey plate - gold pin
Note that all of the tubes above have the 3 mica spacer design with one exception - the Tung Sol.

Wow never thought I'd see so many Sylvania tubes on a bet of list in my life. While I generally find Sylvanias unexceptional in most all types in this category they are over achievers and that reputation precedes them. But I me getting ahead of myself. Lets start instead with the:

GE 5751-WA Black Plate - This is a '50s production tube. Many tube freaks say its simply a relabeled RCA, but I own RCAs and there are subtle internal differences and rather dramatic sonic differences compared to that brand. This tube is often found as a military boxed government contract tube (ex.:JG-5751) and is always in my experience boxed in a white date coded box. They invariably have production dates in the 1956-1959, or so, range. Its got shiny black plates which are shaped differently from the later GE grey plate versions of this tube. OK, enough physical description, how does it sound? Well to my ears its a more refined and yet more lively tube than those in group one. It has a good linear frequency response with fairly good HF extension, if not quite as palpable in the mids as a few others in group 2, but not by much. It measures like a dream too. Like all early 5751s I've ever tested (1955-1965, or so) these guys are unbelievable tight in terms of gain, low noise levels and vanishingly low microphonics. I can literally grab any two of these off the shelf randomly and have a near perfectly matched pair - not at all typical of later production GE tubes. You will occasionally stumble on these at tube dealers and when you do they wont cost much, usually just $10 to $18 a tube - Why? No one seems to know about these guys. I've only found 1 NOS tube dealer whose ever listened to it and who understands how good it is. The others will sell it off like almost any other GE 5751 without realizing what they've got on their hands (heh, heh)...

Tung Sol 5751 - this guy is a bit of a sleeper and odd man out here, but its worth grabbing if you stumble on it cheap. This tube is a bit different from the others on the list in terms of physical design. All of the other tubes here are of the 3 mica spacer design with short wide plates. This tube, on the other hand, has an internal construction similar to a traditional 12AX7 -tall ribbed grey plates with no 3rd mica spacer. Perhaps as a result of this it sounds a bit like a cross between the two types - while it is not quite as focused as the other top of the heap 5751s, it does have avery good sense of life, body and ambience. I actually lived quite happily with this tube in the Thor for about 4 months before stumbling on the next tube on the list. Pricing on this guy when you can find him is quite reasonable - usually no more than $15 a tube. You just wont see him real often, though I have noted a few ebay auctions recently and SND tube sales has had them in the past (sorry, I already cleaned them out though!)

Raytheon - Well this guy is one of the happy surprises on the list. I first stumbled on him about a year ago and lived quite happily with a pair in the Thor until I finally found some of the killer Sylvanias. The great thing about this tube beyond its sound quality is its availability, but more on that later. The strength of this tube is its overall balance. Its got the 5751 sense of focus in spades, is clean, open and evenhanded in frequency response if just a little sweet on top. As a result it has just a bit less life and energy than some of the premium Sylvanias and even the GE black plate. Its also a bit less forward in terms of where it puts the performers in the soundstage compared to those tubes - but I still wouldn't call it laid back. Availability on this guy is pretty good. Tube world has been selling these for the past several months, SND has had them in the past as well, and a pair or two are on auction at ebay every few weeks. Price? Usually $15 to $18 a tube. I'd definitely track down a pair of these if I were playing around with 5751s...

Sylvania black plate government contract gold labels (JHS, CAA, etc...)
Sylvania Gold Brand black plate

- I抦 combining these, because my eyes and ears tell me they are indeed the same tubes. These are early Sylvania 5751s from the '50s and they are distinguished from their later brethren by their black plates. The Gold Brand (literally, Sylvania's premium consumer tube line) version is a bit unusual in that the black plate gold brands had steel pins rather than the gold pins of other tubes in that line. Both of these tubes were apparently made on the same production line - those intended for the consumer market got the Gold Brand label and those for government contract were custom labeled for the acquiring agency (JHS or CAA for example - CAA-5751, JHS-5751). The ink used on the tubes themselves was gold and it rubs off easily, so even NOS tubes can have partial labels. Now all of this is my conjecture based on comparing the internal structures carefully and comparative listening - but after doing so I am convinced the tubes are identical. So what do you hear when these guys are in circuit? Well they have an absolutely glorious midrange - female vocals are to die for, or is it kill for? (Don't get between me and the VR6s while these are in circuit and I抦 playing Jonathan Brooke's Live cd - you have been warned!). The other thing is that they have a marvelous sense of life and a tangible (almost spooky) sense of 3 dimensionality to images in the soundstage, particularly vocals. The overall effect is one of a very transparent, warm yet lively sound with a complete lack of fizz or grain and a high level of detail retrieval allied with great vocal reproduction. Downsides - they are a bit forward in balance. If your system already pushes vocalists at you these guys might put them in your lap. But given that caveat I haven't heard a better 5751 in my system and I use it full time in my rig. Oh yeah, one other potential warning - one dealer who knows these well has experienced short tube life with the Sylvania black plates. I have recently checked my first pair after about 6 months of use and while one tests as new, the other tests as about 50% - so there may be something to this issue. I will keep you posted. Availability is the other problem with these guys. I've tracked down a dozen or so over the past year, but only one pair came form an audio NOS tube dealer, the others have been hard won through hamfests, reaching out to off the beaten path dealers and e-mail contacts. When you find them prices vary quite a bit - I've found gold brands for $25 to $35 and the govt contract JHS & CAA tubes for as little as $12 - apparently I'm the only human on earth who has gotten both and figured out that they are identical. And now you know too!!

Sylvania Gold Brand grey pl ate gold pin - OK, this is the legend. When people talk wantonly about the famous Sylvania Gold Brand 5751 gold pins this is the tube they are referring to. Does it measure up to the hype? Well by and large, yes. To my ears it is the the 2nd or 3rd best 5751 ranking up there with the Sylvania & GE black plates. Its strength is its midrange, but it may also be its weakness. The mids here are full, lush, tangible and maybe (just maybe) a trifle overblown. Occasionally i find the lush full vocals obscure just a bit of detail and reduce transparency slightly, but the mids are so lush I could understand how you might not care. The tube also has a measure of life and vibrancy, similar to the Sylvania's black plates and it also has a bit of the forwardness that's seems to be endemic to Sylvanias in the 5751 family. I've lived with this tube enough to know I could use it quite happily, though that would be in the context of a fairly neutral system where its own colorations would not go over the top. If your rig is already warm, smooth, lush and a bit lacking in detail this guy could turn things just a touch syrupy. But given the sound of a lot of cd based systems he could be just the ticket... Availability on this guy is limited. His reputation has made him a rare, if not outrageously expensive beast (usually $30 - $40 a tube) and he is long lived, unlike his black plate brother. Vintage Tube Services has got these on hand every so often and you will occasionally find them at other premium audio NOS tube dealers. As with other rare beasts I've had more luck finding them at hamfests and through the dealers I've met at them, as well as by reaching off the beaten path to ham radio tube dealers and other tube sellers who don't cater to the audiophile crowd.

Well there you go. One audionuts personal journey deep into the world of 12AX7s and their substitutes. What would I do if I were looking to test the 5751 waters? Well I'd look to assemble a cast of three or four alternatives for a personal in-home shoot out. The beauty of the 5751s relatively lower popularity and awareness compared to 12AX7s is that they are cheap. Your can buy 2 or 3 pair of these guys for the price of one pair of Teles or Mullards. A great place to start would be to chase down the more common versions, say a pair each of the Sylvania grey plates, Raytheons and the common RCAs - I'd only buy the triple mica spacer versions by the way. That pile of tubes would set you back $75 - $90 or so and would give you 3 distinctly different tuning options with which to evaluate the best match for your particular gear. That's three chances to improve the sound of your system for the cost of one pair of Teles! The ones that don't lock in are still a great investment by the way - if you change another component in the system in the future they represent great tools for revoicing the system. I cant stress this aspect of evaluating alternatives for yourself because depending on your system and your taste your conclusions on which tube is the best for you could be quite different. This was brought home recently when Jack G & I compared 4 of the group 2 tubes in both our systems - our conclusions were basically reversed! I was using them in a neutral line stage, he was using them in a romantic phono stage. So as always its horses for courses - and trust your own ears.

What about the rarer more esoteric stuff? Well Id make sure I liked 5751s by trying the cheaper more common ones first, then I'd be opportunistic. You literally cant tell where or when they will pop up so you have to be patient and active in your search - who knows maybe you'll get lucky.

Well, hope this helps.
最后编辑ericfdai
TOP
31#

发烧38度 在 2004-6-28 11:15:34 发表的内容
已下载了,谢谢ercifdai兄。给我密码吧

收短信
TOP
32#

要7308的朋友快去看看:
Amperex7308/E188cc六十年代美产,大除气环,成色好,190元一对包邮
http://www.bbs01.com/add.php?forum=3&titid=150772&replyid=150772&style=0
TOP
33#

fever兄:
上次肥胆兄到我家听过用TFK的ecc83,在我的机器上,和黄字大盾搭配。味道和厚度确实胜过RCA black plate tirple mica 5751.
但5751高频很甜美,味道厚度和音场差了一些。
后来Sylvania yellow logoblack plate tirple mica 5751 .date code 5648D/312E(56年48周星期四,312E是Sylvania 的编号),和RCA比中频厚很多,高频不但甜美而且延伸好,音场也好一些,其他相当。
我还是认为,除了没有Mullard和TFK的特殊味道外,其他的应该不输。

Fever兄所提的更高型号Sylvania GB triple mica gray plate gold pins 5751,是否60年代产品(有些只有金标没有金脚的为政府或民用定制的印有JHS,CAA等标志的),我这支还没有extra suport rod(后期为了减少microphone 效应加的两根钢柱),是否应该更早期啊。
TOP
34#

fever 在 2003-12-10 23:17:31 发表的内容
ericfdai 在 2003-12-10 11:22:40 发表的内容
前几天在小付那里买的全新红字黑屏RCA 5751(Command系列)已到手。
[upload=jpg]uploadImages/2003121011132212564.jpg[/upload]
结果不是三云母和方环的。但声音还不错。
Fever兄:
不知这对RCA  Command 系列的5751 是什么档次啊。
昨天在网上又订了一只二手的 Sylvania 5751 黑屏,三云母,方环,现在等货中。

三只 IEC Mullard 的 12au7已到,管子确实很新(参数分别是:110/110;104/109;94/106).初步试听后,觉得确实没有黄字 Mullard的好.不过比EH的中频要好的多,一分价钱一分货啊!



ericfdai  兄,你那對 RCA  5751  是 『黑屏』 系列中最低檔的,待你的 SYLVANIA  5751,記着一定要是 『黃字』 『閃電嘜』 『黑屏』 『三雲母』 『方環』才是最好的 SYLVANIA  5751,配上 MULLARD  『黃字』 12AU7  那才精彩呢。




回头看看以前的帖子,回顾自己学习的进步的历程,真实感慨万千啊!

至今才找到Fever兄所提的Sylvania 5751,还是他最好。
TOP
35#

Dr.PAN:

不用客气,互相帮助和学习是应该的。
其实我也是在Fever兄的指点和帮助下慢慢入门的。
很庆幸坛子里有向Fever兄这样的良师益友,无私的奉献着自己的多年经验。
很值得我们学习呀!
最后编辑ericfdai
TOP
36#

美国胆管的厂牌年期的鉴别

These are codes often seen stamped on components found in US made vintage tube equipment. This list is circa 1955, and some codes have been reassigned or added since that time.

Code formats were not completely standardized, but a little deciphering will generally yield the info of interest. Note that many makers also stamped OEM (Original Eqipment Manufacturer) part numbers above or below the EIA code, in some cases parts makers or the customer elected not to include the EIA codes, so not all parts have them.

They generally follow the following format: (example)

322 5904

where 322 is the manufacturer code (in this case Tungsol), 59 is the year (1959), and 04 is the week.

One alternate scheme is:

274 940

274 is the EIA code (RCA) 9 is the last digit of the year (in this case 1949). Usually single digit date codes are from the 1940's, but have on occasion shown up in later decades, even up to the 1970's. If one has a general idea of the age of the piece in question, usually the decade can be divined from that.

Another alternate is in the format following:

188-5 69 32

188 is General Electric. 5 is the plant code (in this case, Owensboro, Kentucky). 69 32 is 1969, 32nd week.

And another is like this:

322 6104-1

322 is Tungsol, 6104 is 1961, 4th week, 1 is the shift code (1 would probably be the day shift)

After about 1960, many tube manufacturers went to encrypted alphabetical date codes., such as:

KE

188-5

The reason was purportedly to allow factories to track the dates of manufacture of defective tubes (especially important in the case of OEM customers that might send back entire batches of tubes), but avoid possible consumer complaints about "stale" tubes. This sounds perhaps a little silly since the shelf life of tubes is decades, at least (indefinite in practical terms), but some OEM's might have beenn a bit irritated by occasional consumer complaints such as "my 1961 model TV has 1959 model tubes in it!"

Tubes made for the US military, or certain OEMs (such as some test equipment manufacturers) that requested it, continued to carry numerical date codes.

In years past, EIA (Electronic Industries Association) also went by the name of RETMA, and the original acronym of RMA (Radio Manufacturer's Association).
EIA Code Lists for:
Tubes
Capacitors
Transformers
Potentiometers (controls) & Resistors
Speakers
Other Manufacturers
  Tubes and CRT's EIA code
Amperex (USA)  111
Bendix 125
DuMont 158
Eimac (Eitel-McCullough, Inc) 162
Electronic Tube Corp 169
General Electric Co (USA) 188
Hytron (CBS-Hytron) 210
Machlett 231
RCA (Radio Corp of America) 274
Raytheon 280
Superior Tube Co 310
Sylvania (Hygrade Sylvania Corp) 312
Tung-Sol 322
United Electronics 323
Western Electric 336
Westinghouse 337
Zenith Radio Corp (CRT's) 343
Nortn American Philips Corp 423
Taylor (aka Cetron-Taylor) 713
Lewis & Kaufman 738
National Electronics (also Cetron) 749
Penta Laboratories 771
Vacuum Tube Products 781
Varian Associates 809
Litton Industries 879
Electrons, Inc 935
Capacitors EIA code
Aerovox Corp 102
American Condensor  109
Centralab 134
Chicago Condensor 135
Aerovox Hi-Q Division 163
John E Fast 178
General Electric 188
Mallory 235
Micamold 240
Millen 242
Radio Condensor Company 273
Solar 296
Sprague 303
Gudeman 438
Good-All 446
Barker & Wiiliamson 461
Pyramid 472
United Condensor  516
Electrical Utilities Corp 569
Illinois Capacitor (Condensor) 616
American Radionic 648
Sangamo 658
Ajax 705
Standard Condensor  710
RMC (Radio Materials Corp) 732
Condensor Manufacturers 885
Transformers & Coils EIA code
Stancor (Chicago-Standard) 138
Coil Engineering 141
Ensign Coil 172
Freed  183
General Radio 194
Jefferson Electric 218
Thordarsen-Meissner 238
Merit Coil & Transformer 239
Standard Coil 305
Essex (Transformer Division) 352
New York Transformer 366
Altec Lansing-Peerless 391
Foster Transformer 394
General Transformer 412
United Transformer Corp (UTC) 418
Radio-Television Products Corp 489
Empire Coil 452
Caledonia 503
Triwec Transformer 524
Midwest Coil & Transformer 549
Standard Winding Co 550
F & V Coil Winding 572
Woodward-Schumacher 606
Central Coil 637
Electrical Windings 682
Grand Transformers 757
Forest Electric 773
Ogden Coil & Transformer 776
Triad  830
Better Coil & Transformer 831
Acro Products (Acrosound) 878
Mohawk 883
American Transformer 892
Tresco 897
Coilcraft 906
Aerocoil 908
Acme Coil & Transformer 928
Magnetic Coil Mfring 933
Northlake 1005
Pacific 1052

  Resistor & Potentiometers EIA code
Allen-Bradley 106
Centralab 134
CTS (Chicago Telephone Supply) 137
Clarostat 140
Erie 173
IRC (International Resistance Co) 214
Mallory 235
Muter 244
Ohmite 251
Speer 300
Stackpole 304
Ward Leonard 532
Milwaukee Resistor 722
Dale 816
Atlas 932
Speakers (Drivers only, not cabinets) EIA Code
CTS (Chicago Telephone Supply) 137
Jensen 220
Magnavox 232
DuKane (Operadio Corp) 252
Quam (Quam-Nichols) 270
Rola 285
Utah 328
Western Electric 336
Altec Lansing Corp 391
North American Philips (Norelco) 423
Oxford  465
Waldom Electronics 555
Electro-Voice 649
Russell Speaker Co 748
Quincy Speaker Mfr Corp 767
Klipsch 843
University 847
Oaktron 934


Other commonly seen manufacturers
  Company Product Code
Admiral Corp TV's, Radios 101
Alpha Wire 733
Amphenol Sockets, plugs 554
ATR Vibrators 551
Anaconda Wire 547
Arvin Sears radios & TV's 248
Astatic Phono cartridges 345
Belden Wire 579
Bell Amps 708
Bogen Amps 589
BIC British imports 409
Cannon Connectors 440
Cinch Sockets, connectors 139
Collins Radio gear 439
Connector Corp Sockets, connectors 888
Consolidated Wire 607
Crosley Radios 152
Drake RF gear 851
DuKane (Operadio) Amps 252
Eby Sockets 160
Empire Phono cartridges 452
Essex Wire 175
Gates RF gear 187
General Cement Adhesives, Testor's paint 396
General Radio Test Equip 194
Hallicrafters  Ham & SW gear 199
Hammarlund Ham & SW gear 201
Harmon-Kardon Hi-fi gear 794
Hickok Test Equip 508
International Rectifier Semiconductors 845
Jackson Tube Testers 216
E F Johnson Sockets, ham xcvrs 222
Kester Solder 224
Keystone Hardware 699
Lenz Wire 228
Littelfuse Fuses 230
McIntosh Hifi gear 793
Methode Connectors 720
James Millen Sockets 242
Muntz Cheap TV's 772
National Co Ham & SW gear, hifi 245
Newcomb Amps 437
Packard Bell TV's radios computers 254
Philco Radios & TV's 260
Philmore Hardware 262
Pickering (Stanton) Phono cartridges 631
Pilot Hifi tuners & amps 264
Pioneer Cheap recievers 706
Precision (Grommes) Hifi & PA amps 871
Radio Craftsmen Hifi gear 275
J P Seeburg Jukeboxes 289
Shure Brothers Phono carts, mics 590
Mark Simpson (MASCO) PA Amps 295
Simpson Electric Meters 614
Sonotone Phono cartridges 787
Tetrad Phono cartridges 842
Triplett Test equipment 321
Wells-Gardner Monkey Wards radios 334
Weston Test Equipment 338
Zenith Radios & TV's 343


Back to Uncle Ned's Mailbag
TOP
37#

最靓声的5751.

他和TFK坑屏,Mullard,amperex ECC83比,大获全胜。
他中频厚度和高频延伸远胜RCA 三云母 黑屏 方换 5751
他分析力绝对超群,高频顺华细腻,去的很尽。
他中频厚润丰满,听人声靓到能杀人。
他低频下潜深而有力,音场定位准确稳健
他动态极佳,声音纯净无染
他比起ECC83的软,松,较朦胧的音场定位-----------所谓的味道,显得高贵而纯洁。
他无论听人声,流行,还是交响,全胜ECC83.
他唯一的不足是音场稍稍考前一点点.(不仔细听完全感觉不到)

他就是:
Sylvania 黄字、闪电标、三云母、黑屏、方换、普通脚、5751WA、Date Code 56,57年
[upload=jpg]uploadImages/200461510123499431.jpg[/upload]
[/quote][upload=jpg]uploadImages/20046161203668978.jpg[/upload]

如今国内二手ECC83被抄到几百块一支的离谱价格,区区几十块RMB的二手Sylvania 5751(美国NOS叫价US$60一支),却能完胜。

强烈建议有米或是无米的胆友,不要在找什么ECC83了,搞几只这种5751听听,决不会后悔。

补充一句,前几天我推荐此管,现如今已经买完了。
多留意材料网,如今后再有出现,决不要放过他。

关于,美国胆管的厂牌年期的鉴别,见下文。
最后编辑ericfdai
TOP
38#

西门子有很多厂家OEM的,声音不同。
最好买德国原厂出品的最好。
TFK的金脚E88CC稍好些。
TOP
39#

Fever兄:

Sylvania 黄字、闪电标、三云母、黑屏、方换、普通脚、5751WA、Date Code 56,57年
[/quote][upload=jpg]uploadImages/20046161203668978.jpg[/upload]
这种5751我订了两支,可惜一支是坏的。另外一支略有microphone效应。
昨天联系了十几家国内JS,这种管找不到了!
不知香港和广州能否淘的到。
Fever兄能否帮忙找找看,NOS或二手的都可以。

在此多谢了!
最后编辑ericfdai
TOP
40#

胆管通报:
Sylvania,RCA 三云母片黑屏方环5751,60一支.有十几只。
http://shop.valveart.net/dispbbs.asp?boardID=27&RootID=3342&ID=3342&skin=0
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题