发烧论坛

注册

 

发新话题 回复该主题

LP自己造,天下之大,发烧一样 [复制链接]

查看: 10971|回复: 26
21#

精神可嘉! 是本国发烧友做的吗?

我在10年前看日本MJ杂志时就已经有日本发烧友自制LP唱盘的详细图片和加工过程.非常佩服!

至于木唱臂, 是60-70年代的设计.看看下面这个DD,很漂亮吧?
[upload=jpg]uploadImages/20035823505557221.jpg[/upload]
TOP
22#

The picture shows the final version of the author's (Poul Ladegaard) first prototype. Here he uses a sort of ball bearing to pivot the arm. Later he found that knife blades work equally well. (Stanley blades seem fine)

The arm tube is a carbon fibre tube, actually from a badminton racket. This seems to be a very good choice of material for the arm. The mid graph of 'armgraphs.jpg' shows measurements of vibration done on the arm using a high level sweep. The arm behaves well, as the graph shows.

The arm lift appearing on this picture is made from bent piano wire and an oil damped lift from an old Colton arm.

看过以上文字准备气死LP12的玩家们
TOP
23#

上海玩家 在 2003-5-9 9:16:45 发表的内容
The picture shows the final version of the author's (Poul Ladegaard) first prototype. Here he uses a sort of ball bearing to pivot the arm. Later he found that knife blades work equally well. (Stanley blades seem fine)

The arm tube is a carbon fibre tube, actually from a badminton racket. This seems to be a very good choice of material for the arm. The mid graph of 'armgraphs.jpg' shows measurements of vibration done on the arm using a high level sweep. The arm behaves well, as the graph shows.

The arm lift appearing on this picture is made from bent piano wire and an oil damped lift from an old Colton arm.

看过以上文字准备气死LP12的玩家们


我看不出對LP12的用家會有什麼作用。還有﹐圖在哪裡??
TOP
24#

没什么实用价值,因LP大碟机机械要求很高,重量要轻,买一个回来摩机还可行,自行制,还是用木头制,浪费气力。
TOP
25#

下岗之人 在 2003-5-10 18:14:33 发表的内容
没什么实用价值,因LP大碟机机械要求很高,重量要轻,买一个回来摩机还可行,自行制,还是用木头制,浪费气力。


赞同你的观点!也不反对此精神可嘉,我认为满足自己动手的欲望,玩一下,无可厚非.但以为可以弄出好的声音用来欣赏音乐,那是愚蠢与无知!
TOP
26#

手工不错啦。
TOP
27#

我们认同的是这种发烧精神,这个唱盘能发出声音就非常不错了,如果在广州的话,我一定要去听听。
要真的好声的话,我相信随便一个唱盘都比它好声。
TOP
发新话题 回复该主题